Handwriting analysis of Donald Trump

I don't agree with this graphologist. Sharp points don't necessarily indicate high intelligence.

Since Donald Trump has recently won the presidential election I thought I would try to analyze his handwriting and compare with Clinton. He is known as a great promoter and businessman. For the most part his business consists of promoting his name for buildings and this preoccupation is evident in his signature.

• Of the three zones the midzone is dominate which can indicate a focus or preoccupation with the present moment. This is supported by his Twitter usage. Twitter is a social media site where the more popular tweets change on the hour. 
• One graphologist, Shelia Lowe,says that a dominate midzone suggests the person isn't interested in the abstract or planning. He/she is primarily interested in taking action and not why things happen. This fits Trump quite well.
• The midzone letters are quite angular and this according to most graphologists is a sign of aggression. Trump is known for being contentious and litigious.
• Due to his predominate midzone I wouldn't say he is overly egotistical or overly confident. Perhaps his bravado is somewhat of an act? Hillary Clinton's signature shows more confidence and ego.
• The slant is up and down and this indicates reserve and coolness. He isn't one to let his heart rule his head.
• The letters are very compressed and this indicates some stress or tension. One graphologist named Shelia Lowe says this suggests impetuousness and someone who overreacts to everything. This person desperately wants to be accepted.
• The fact that the first name is enmeshed in the last is interesting. This might indicate he is very close to his family almost to the point where he doesn't make a distinction. This could be why he wants his relatives to be with him in the white house. 
• At the end of the last name there is a stroke that comes back over the last name in a protective way. One graphologist suggests this might indicate a desire to draw attention to self.
• The writing is on the pasty side which can mean a preoccupation with sensuality. 
• Donald and Trump are the same size which means he doesn't see himself as more important than his family.

The overall impression of his handwriting reminds me of Himmler who I believe was one of Hitler's generals. I think Germans at that period in time tended to more of an angular style of writing. Trump's preoccupation with aggression and the military might support this to a degree.

The Presidential Candidate's Signatures

I thought it might be interesting to use graphology to examine the two presidential candidate's signatures.

Obama:

• The upper zone is very developed which can indicate pride, over sensitivity in regards to intellectual capacity, and or a general interest in abstract matters
• The writing is fairly rounded which usually signifies agreeability/a relaxed attitude
• The down stroke on k and b are very firmly made. This could indicate firmness or stubbornness
• Most of the "a"s and "o"s are fairly open which means he has an communication style.
• The ending stroke on "Obama" signifies assertiveness
• An upright slant equals a cool objective outlook but it can be indecisive at times.
• His writing has a print script style which means he uses a combination of logic and intuition.
• The most interesting thing about his signature is the fact that the line for b intersects the capital "O". This has been interpreted different ways by graphologists. One suggested that since it divided the "O" into equal parts it signified a interest in equality however many graphology books say that any stroke that appears to cancel another is a form of anger towards self. Since the last name symbolizes one's family/parent and we know he had somewhat of a difficult relationship with his father, it could be interpreted as anger at his father. In addition the "B" of Barack is made larger which might indicate that he thinks more of himself than his father.

Romney:

• A right slant indicates decisiveness,emotion, and someone who is more action orientated.
• He has a somewhat angular style which means he might be more intractable in an argument.
• "Romney" not as legible could indicate a less than transparent communication style. This is often seen in administrators/doctors/diplomats. Illegibility essentially says that they don't care whether you can read it or not.
• The "y" formation is made in an efficient, determined yet not friendly manner. Lower loops usually signify our unconscious attitudes toward sex/relationships and the leftward direction of the lower stroke could mean that this lack of agreeableness/anger is somehow rooted in the past.
• The "t" bar essential dots the i and crosses the "t" which signifies a very efficient mind. The "t" bar is also higher than normal which could mean an interest in abstract matters. 
• The capitals of "Mitt" and "Romney" are the same high height indicating he has equal regard for himself and family.
• The writing has relatively greater pastiosity(thickness of stroke) than Obama's which according to most books is another indicator of emotion. 
• The midzone is larger than Obama's and this could signify more attention to the present and greater practicality.

Overall Obama has a more professorial feel to his signature while Romney has a more zealous one. If these two would debate I would anticipate Romney being the one who would go more on the attack but then that usually is the job of the non-incumbent.